If you’ve been injured in a motor vehicle accident – whether driving, riding or walking – you may be entitled to claim road injury compensation.
If you’ve been injured at your workplace or as part of your work, you may be entitled to compensation. Our specialist workers’ compensation lawyers are here to help, so you can focus on healing.
If you’ve suffered an injury in a public place because of someone else’s negligence, you may be entitled to compensation. Our specialist public liability compensation lawyers are here to help.
Contesting a Will may seem daunting, but our experienced team of lawyers will support you every step of the way. If you’ve been excluded or inadequately provided for, you may be able to contest or challenge a Will.
If you’ve suffered sexual abuse or mistreatment, our experienced sexual abuse lawyers are dedicated to seeking the compensation you deserve.
Navigating medical negligence claims during times of illness can be overwhelming. If you’ve faced negligent treatment or injury under medical care, you may qualify for compensation.
Apart from claiming superannuation, if injury or illness prevents you from working, you may qualify for a TPD claim. Our dedicated superannuation claim lawyers are here to help you win fair compensation on a ‘no win, no fee’ basis.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vitae ut amet nunc facilisis porttitor. Habitasse in aliquet facilisis pretium, ipsum suspendisse ultricies.
Book a consultationNeed information on this but it would be good to include years of experience
We win the compensation you deserve on a no win, no fee basis.
We provide industry-leading, expert advice and achieve wonderful results for our clients.
If you believe that the effects of WiFi, mobile phones, or mobile phone tower base stations have caused injury to yourself, your child/children or a friend, you are not alone. The increasingly widespread use of WiFi across business and government (especially in schools) is a move that goes against the rapidly mounting body of credible scientific evidence which makes increasingly clear that exposure to even low levels of electromagnetic radiation (also known as EMR), which includes WiFi, on an ongoing basis has a wide range of serious adverse health effects.
These health effects can include:
As long ago as 2011 the World Health Organisation classified EMR as a class 2B “possible carcinogen” to humans. Since then, the scientific evidence has strengthened, and many scientists around the world are now calling for that classification to be upgraded.
In more recent years it is increasingly well established that there are numerous adverse health effects of EMR, some of which can be immediate (such as for those people with electromagnetic sensitivity), but many of which are not immediate but are cumulative and irreversible.
Children are the most likely to suffer from the damaging effects of EMR due to their developing bodies and longer daily/yearly/lifetime exposure to EMR from all sources, including most hours of the day every school day (which they have no choice but to attend). However, children are not the only ones affected.
In 2015 about 190 scientists and doctors from around the world called for far more stringent requirements on EMR than currently exist in some western countries, including Australia. This group has now increased to over 240 scientists and doctors from 42 countries.
Also in 2015, Lloyds of London, one of the world’s largest insurers, excluded as standard from its policies any EMR injury claims. They did so for good reason, and many insurers around the world have done the same. Even insurers see EMR as a significant claims risk. Any business/government/school not covered by insurance for injury caused by EMR (including WiFi) may be liable for injuries it causes from EMR now and in the future
Numerous countries and regional areas across Europe, and even countries such as Cyprus and Israel, have banned WiFi in schools due to the risk of its damaging health effects upon children. Legal actions relating to EMR in Europe have succeeded, and in Australia, a government worker has successfully sued the Federal government body and obtained compensation for an EMR related injury for nausea, disorientation, and headaches.
As recently as in 2018 a long term study in the United States (Federal Department of Health’s National Toxicology Program) confirmed that there is “clear evidence” that long term exposure to EMR caused a particular type of cancer in rats, with several other types of cancer considered “probable.” The results of this study were replicated by a similar independent study in Italy (the prestigious Ramazzini Institute).
In January 2019 the Italian government has been ordered by its courts to conduct a public awareness campaign regarding the health risks associated with EMR, due to commence in July 2019.
Despite claiming otherwise, Australian government departments (including schools) and businesses have long been on notice of the potential adverse health effects of EMR, including mobile phones, WiFi, and mobile phone base station towers.
Emeritus Professor Anthony Miller, one of the world’s leading experts on cancer, dismisses telco industry and government claims that EMR cannot cause harm as “simply false” and the suggestion that there are no “established” health effects as “misleading”.
If you are concerned about EMR exposure and you think that it may have caused your or your child health problems or injury please contact us to discuss.
John was involved in a serious motor vehicle accident due to another driver’s negligence.
Karina was a single mother when involved in a motor vehicle accident that wasn’t her fault and suffered a number of injuries to her left shoulder, back and neck.
Steve was a single father when he was knocked off his motorbike by a motor vehicle.
Grazyna injured her foot when she stepped on uneven ground when leaving the premises of Casula Mall.
Elie was an unemployed man showering at home in his rental property when some small wall tiles fell off and hit him in the left shoulder.
Goran was in the course of his employment unloading a truck at someone else’s premises when he injured his shoulder and back.
Anne was injured in a workplace accident.
Talia was at work when a forklift reversed over her left foot.
Steve suffered psychological injury when a work colleague fell off the bonnet of a car. Steve thought his colleague had been crushed. He hadn’t.
Gloria sat on a broken chair at a well-known fast food outlet causing minor injury.
What makes our team the right choice for you?
"(Required)" indicates required fields